What Ever Happened to Anti-Essentialism?

  • Graham McFee Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of Brighton, UK and Professor, Department of Philosophy, California State University Fullerton, USA.
Keywords: Anti-essentialism, Kennick, Weitz, Waismann

Abstract

What Ever Happened to Anti-Essentialism?

How should one explain the relative disappearance of a major preoccupation of English-speaking Analytical Philosophy in the late 1950s/early 1960s: an anti-essentialist response to the question, ‘What is art?’, typified in papers by Kennick and Weitz? Minimally, anti-essentialism denies the widely-held assumption that something must be in common between all the instances where (in our case) the term “[fine] art” or the concept art is rightly ascribed, in virtue of which all are called ‘art’; a stronger version urges that, in fact, there is no essence to (our example) art.

         With counter-arguments typically not forthcoming, Carroll (2000) mentions both Danto’s institutionalism and Mandelbaum’s assault on the notion of family resemblance, to explain the slackening of concern for such neo-Wittgensteinian issues. Consideration of the actual arguments by Kennick and Weitz highlights their unjustified dependence on Waismann’s notion of open texture, where recognizing a clearer application of Wittgenstein’s ideas retains that central, if minimal, anti-essentialist thrust for Kennick and Weitz, thereby returning this issue to the forefront of aesthetic theorizing.

References

Baker, Gordon. 1997. “Preface.” In F. Waismann: Principles of Linguistic
Philosophy
(Second Edition), xi–xxiii. Palgrave Macmillan.

Bell, Clive. 1914. Art. London: Chatto & Windus.

Carroll, Noël. 2000. Theories of Art Today. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Especially “Introduction”: 3-24.

Danto, Arthur. 1964. “The Artworld.” Journal of Philosophy 61 (19): 571–584.

— 1981. The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

— 1987. “The De Kooning Three-Seater.” In The State of the Art,
58–61. New York: Prentice Hall.

— 1989. “The Artworld.” In Aesthetics: A Critical Anthology, edited
by R. Sclafani & R. Roblin G. Dickie, 171–182. New York: St. Martins
Press.

— 1997. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of
History
. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

— 2000. “Art and Meaning.” In Theories of Art Today, edited by Noël
Carroll, 130–140. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

— 2013. What Art Is. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dickie, George. 1974. Art and The Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Frege, Gottlob. 2013 (1893/1903). The Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.

Gallie, W. B. 1948. “The Function of Philosophical Aesthetics.” Mind.
Reprinted in Elton (ed.). 1959. Aesthetics and Language. Oxford: Blackwell:
13-35.

Kennick, William. 1958. “Does Traditional Aesthetics Rest on a Mistake?”
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. Supplementary volume.
Reprinted in Cyril Barrett (ed.). 1965. Collected Papers on Aesthetics.
Oxford: Blackwell: 1-21.

Lopes, Dom. 2014. Beyond Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mandelbaum, Maurice. 1965. “Family Resemblances and Generalizations.”
American Philosophical Quarterly, pp. 219–228.

McFee, Graham. 2011. Artistic Judgement. Dordrecht, Nl.: Springer Verlag.

— 2015. How To Do Philosophy: A Wittgensteinian Reading of
Wittgenstein
. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

Sayers, Dorothy Leigh, and Marion Cumming. 1937. Gaudy night. Royal
Society for the Blind of South Australia.

Suits, Bernard. 1995. “The Elements of Sport.” In Philosophic Inquiry in
Sport
(second edition), edited by W. J. Morgan and K. V. Meier, 8–15.
Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Travis, Charles. 2008. Occasion-Sensitivity: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.

Waismann, Frederich. 1945. “Verifiability.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society
, vol. Supplementary volume. Reprinted in his How I See Philosophy
1968. London: Macmillan: 39-66.

Weitz, Morris. 1956. “The Role of Theory in Aesthetics.” Journal of Aesthetics
and Art Criticism
. Reprinted in Joseph Margolis (ed.), 1962.
Philosophy Looks At The Arts. New York: Scribners: 48-60.

Wisdom, John. 1965. Paradox and Discovery. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009 (1953). Philosophical Investigations – cited as
“PI”. Oxford: Blackwell.

— 1958. The Blue and Brown Books – cited as “BB”. Oxford: Blackwell.

— 1974. Philosophical Grammar – cited as “PG”. Oxford: Blackwell.

— 2004. The Big Typescript: Ts 213 – cited as “BT”. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (and Frederich Waismann). 2003. Voices of Wittgenstein – cited as “VoW”. London: Routledge.
Published
2019-07-11