With Friends Like These… or: How Not to Respond to the Imposition Objection

  • Katheryn Doran Hamilton College
Keywords: Wartenberg, film, imposition objection, Nolan, Insomnia

Abstract

Many analytically trained philosophers argue that for a movie to do philosophy it must contain arguments, or develop thought experimentsor provide counterexamples, otherwise whatever philosophy might seem to be in it is just the viewer's projection. Most of the analytic responses to what Tom Wartenburg calls the “the imposition objection” (IO), including his own, share an assumption I argue is unfounded, namely, that the traditional philosophical text is the standard by which we should judge the philosophical status of anything, including movies. I argue that tethering movies’ philosophy bona fides to standard philosophical works actually invites IO, absent a known philosophically minded creator behind the production. Accepting the argument-centric written text as the standard also begs the question about the nature of philosophy, and discounts (or worse) the philosophical powers of movies and other media; such a position also impoverishes the many and complex ways philosophy deepens our understanding of the world, of others, and of ourselves. I offer a liberating example in my account of Christopher Nolan’s Insomnia on its own philosophical terms.

 

References

Elgin, Catherine. 1999. Considered Judgment. Princeton: Princeton University Press/Princeton.

Light, Andrew. 2003. Reel Arguments: Film, Philosophy, and Social Criticism. New York/ London: Routledge/New York.

Mulhall, Stephen. 2002. On Film. New York/ London: Routledge/New York.

Nolan, Christopher, director. 2002. Insomnia. USA.

Nunan, Richard. 2010. “Filmosophy and the Art of Philosophical Analysis of Films.” Film and Philosophy 14: 135-54.

--- 2014. “Film as Philosophy in Memento: Reforming Wartenberg’s Imposition Objection.” Film and Philosophy 18:1-18.

--- 2017. “Authorial Intent, Alien3, and Thomas Wartenberg’s Alleged Necessary Condition for Films to Do Philosophy.” Film & Philosophy 21:52-73.

Smith, Murray. 2006. “Film Art, Argument, and Ambiguity.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1):33-42.

Smuts, Aaron. 2009. "Film as Philosophy: In Defense of the Bold Thesis." Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67.4: 409-420.

Wartenberg, Thomas. 2007. Thinking On Screen: Film as Philosophy. New York/ London: Routledge/New York.

Wartenberg, Thomas. 2015. “The Imposition Objection Reconsidered: A Response to Richard Nunan.” Film and Philosophy 19: 1-14.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc.

Published
2020-07-22
Section
Philosophy of film without theory