Inaugurating Philosophy of Film Without Theory
Philosophy of film without theory is a methodology that aims to motivate and legitimise the current and future development of a range of a-, non-, and anti-theoretical ways of working at the intersection of film and philosophy. We contrast philosophy of film without theory with the main traditions of theoretically orientated philosophy of film, as well as philosophically inflected film Theory and film-philosophy. We also draw attention to the range of philosophical practices and pursuits that distinguish philosophy (in general) without theory and contemporary philosophy (in general) with its near ubiquitous theoretical presumption. The paper finishes with a brief introduction to the various contributions to this Special Issue of Aesthetic Investigations on Philosophy of Film Without Theory.
Allen, Richard. 2001. “Cognitive film theory” in Richard Allen and Malcolm Turvey (eds.) Wittgenstein, Theory and the Art.s London: Routledge 175-210.
Bordwell, David & Carroll, Noel. (eds.) 1996. Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Carroll, Noel. 1996. “Prospects for Film Theory: A Personal Assessment” in David Bordwell and Noel Carroll Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. 37-68.
Carroll, Noël 2011. “Philosophical Insight, Emotion, and Popular Fiction: The Case of Sunset Boulevard.” in Noël Carroll and John Gibson (eds.) Narrative, Emotion, and Insight. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Carroll, Noël; Di Summa, Laura T., & Loht, Shawn. 2019. The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures Palgrave Macmillan
Chappell, Sophie Grace. 2014. Knowing What to Do: Imagination, Virtue and Platonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Currie, Greg. 2016. “Methods in the Philosophy of Literature and Film.” in Herman Cappelen, Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 641-656.
Fox, Craig & Harrison, Britt. forthcoming. Philosophy of Film Without Theory Palgrave Macmillan.
Gaut, Berys. 2010. A Philosophy of Cinematic Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hacker. P. M. S. 2001. “Wittgenstein and the autonomy of humanistic understanding” in Richard Allen and Malcolm Turvey (eds.) (2001) Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts. London: Routledge. 39-74.
Hacker. P. M. S. 2009. “Philosophy: A Contribution not to Knowledge, but to Human Understanding.”Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 65. 129-153.
Harrison, Britt. (forthcoming). “Review of Rawls, Christina; Neiva, Diana, & Gouveia, Steven S., (eds.) (2019) Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides. Oxford: Routledge” in Debates in Aesthetics.
Kenny, Anthony. 2009. “Cognitive Scientism.” in Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds) Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy: Essays for P.M.S. Hacker. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 250-262
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sinnerbrink, Robert. 2019. ‘Film and Ethics’ in Christina Rawls et al (eds.) (2019) Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides Oxford: Routledge
Turvey, Malcolm. 2001. ‘Is scepticism a ‘natural possibility’ of language? Reasons to be sceptical of Cavell’s Wittgenstein’ in Richard Allen and Malcolm Turvey (eds.) Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts London: Routledge 117-136
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).