Architecture as performance
Sigurd Lewerentz’s uncut bricks
Might architecture be reconceived as a form of performance? I draw upon Nelson Goodman’s writing on architecture—including his account of architectural notation—and David Davies’s performance theory, which claims that artworks should be considered not as products made by generative performances, but rather as the performances themselves. I tie the exemplification that Goodman identifies as the primary way architectural works ‘mean’ to the role of the architectural ‘score’, recast not as a mere ‘constraint’ but as integral to the creative processes by which architecture establishes an ‘artistic statement’ and a distinctive ‘virtual’ realm. In so doing, I reconcile such a position with an aesthetics of reception, whereby the situated encounter with the physical building is seen as essential to the critical retrieval of any given architectural performance. I test this position against a late work by Sigurd Lewerentz, completed when he was in his eighties, and examine the extraordinary lengths necessitated by his idiosyncratic imperative not to cut any bricks, thereby articulating an artwork every bit as radical as contemporaneous works by conceptual artists.
Ahlin, Janne. 1987. Sigurd Lewerentz, Architect, 1885-1975. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Allen, Stan. 1999. “Practice vs Project.” Praxis: Journal of Writing + Building 1 (0): 112–125.
---. 2000. Practice: Architecture, Technique and Representation. Lon- don: Routledge.
Binkley, Timothy. 1977. “Piece: Contra Aesthetics.” The Journal of Aes- thetics and Art Criticism 35 (3): 265–278.
Blundell Jones, Peter. 2002. “Sigurd Lewerentz: Church of St Peter, Klip- pan, 1963-66.” Architectural Research Quarterly 6 (2): 159–173.
Currie, Gregory. 1989. An Ontology of Art. London: MacMillan.
Danto, Arthur. 1964. “The Artworld.” The Journal of Philosophy 61 (19): 571–584.
Davies, David. 2004. Art as Performance. Malden: Blackwell.
---. 2010. “Multiple Instances and Multiple ‘Instances’.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (4): 411–426.
---. 2018. “Locating the Performable Musical Work in Practice: A Non-Platonist Interpretation of the ‘Classical Paradigm’.” In Virtual Works-Actual Things, edited by Paulo de Assis, 45–64. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Davies, Stephen. 1987. Definitions of Art. New York: Cornell University Press.
Dickie, George. 1974. Art and the Aesthetic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art. Indianapolis, Indiana: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
----. 1984. Of Mind and Other Matters. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
----. 1985. “How Buildings Mean.” Critical Inquiry 11 (4): 642–653.
Lamarque, Peter. 2010. Chapter Aesthetic Empiricism of Work and Object: Explorations in the Metaphysics of Art. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
Langer, Susanne K. 1953. Feeling and Form. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Levinson, Jerrold. 1980. “Autographic and Allographic Art Revisited.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 38 (4): 367–383.
----. 2016. “Aesthetic Contextualism.” In Aesthetics Pursuits: Essays in Philosophy of Art, 17–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilder, Ken. 2020. Beholding: Situated Art and the Aesthetics of Reception. London: Bloomsbury.
Wollheim, Richard. 1980. Art and its Objects. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2021 Ken Wilder
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Note: up to volume 4 issue 1, an incorrect copyright line appears in the PDFs of the articles.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).