Architecture as performance

Sigurd Lewerentz’s uncut bricks

  • Ken Wilder University of the Arts London
Keywords: Art as Performance, Architecture, Reception Aesthetics, Nelson Goodman, David Davies

Abstract

Might architecture be reconceived as a form of performance? I draw upon Nelson Goodman’s writing on architecture—including his account of architectural notation—and David Davies’s performance theory, which claims that artworks should be considered not as products made by generative performances, but rather as the performances themselves. I tie the exemplification that Goodman identifies as the primary way architectural works ‘mean’ to the role of the architectural ‘score’, recast not as a mere ‘constraint’ but as integral to the creative processes by which architecture establishes an ‘artistic statement’ and a distinctive ‘virtual’ realm. In so doing, I reconcile such a position with an aesthetics of reception, whereby the situated encounter with the physical building is seen as essential to the critical retrieval of any given architectural performance. I test this position against a late work by Sigurd Lewerentz, completed when he was in his eighties, and examine the extraordinary lengths necessitated by his idiosyncratic imperative not to cut any bricks, thereby articulating an artwork every bit as radical as contemporaneous works by conceptual artists.

References

Ahlin, Janne. 1987. Sigurd Lewerentz, Architect, 1885-1975. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Allen, Stan. 1999. “Practice vs Project.” Praxis: Journal of Writing + Building 1 (0): 112–125.

---. 2000. Practice: Architecture, Technique and Representation. Lon- don: Routledge.

Binkley, Timothy. 1977. “Piece: Contra Aesthetics.” The Journal of Aes- thetics and Art Criticism 35 (3): 265–278.

Blundell Jones, Peter. 2002. “Sigurd Lewerentz: Church of St Peter, Klip- pan, 1963-66.” Architectural Research Quarterly 6 (2): 159–173.

Currie, Gregory. 1989. An Ontology of Art. London: MacMillan.

Danto, Arthur. 1964. “The Artworld.” The Journal of Philosophy 61 (19): 571–584.

Davies, David. 2004. Art as Performance. Malden: Blackwell.

---. 2010. “Multiple Instances and Multiple ‘Instances’.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (4): 411–426.

---. 2018. “Locating the Performable Musical Work in Practice: A Non-Platonist Interpretation of the ‘Classical Paradigm’.” In Virtual Works-Actual Things, edited by Paulo de Assis, 45–64. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Davies, Stephen. 1987. Definitions of Art. New York: Cornell University Press.

Dickie, George. 1974. Art and the Aesthetic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art. Indianapolis, Indiana: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.

----. 1984. Of Mind and Other Matters. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

----. 1985. “How Buildings Mean.” Critical Inquiry 11 (4): 642–653.

Lamarque, Peter. 2010. Chapter Aesthetic Empiricism of Work and Object: Explorations in the Metaphysics of Art. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.

Langer, Susanne K. 1953. Feeling and Form. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Levinson, Jerrold. 1980. “Autographic and Allographic Art Revisited.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 38 (4): 367–383.

----. 2016. “Aesthetic Contextualism.” In Aesthetics Pursuits: Essays in Philosophy of Art, 17–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilder, Ken. 2020. Beholding: Situated Art and the Aesthetics of Reception. London: Bloomsbury.

Wollheim, Richard. 1980. Art and its Objects. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Published
2021-12-30