Art and Human Interaction

Keywords: art, morality, psychological, phenomenological, rhetorical

Abstract

In this Editor’s column I discuss certain fruits and limits of applying the notion of ‘performance’ to works of art. Art works can be viewed as perfor- mances, the public furnishing of works’ final form. Concerts can be viewed as performances of a work scored by someone else, the composer, but not all arts are double in this sense. Moreover, art can be viewed as mirroring the psychological, phenomenological and rhetorical aspects of human interaction, which exemplify the way people scrutinise moral situations. Not all performances are artistic, let alone art.

References

Fridlund, Alan J. 1997. “The new ethology of human facial expressions.” In The Psychology of Facial Expression, edited by James A. Russell and José-Miguel Fernandez-Dols, 103–32. Cambridge University Press.

Gerwen, Rob van. 2014. “Artists’ Experiments and Our Issues with Them – Toward a Layered Definition of Art Practice.” Edited by Fabian Dorsch and Dan-Eugen Ratiu, Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, Volume 6. 158–180.

Levinson, Jerrold. 1990. “Defining Art Historically.” In Music, Art & Metaphysics, 3–25. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wollheim, Richard. 1980. “Criticism as Retrieval.” In Art and its Objects. Second edition, 185–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

----. 1993. “Correspondence, Projective Properties, and Expression in the Arts.” In The Mind and its Depths, 144–158. Cambridge (Mass.), London (England): Harvard University Press.

----. 2001. “On Pictorial Representation.” In Richard Wollheim on the Art of Painting: Art as Representation and Expression, edited by Rob van Gerwen, 13–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Published
2021-12-31