What They See is What We Get in Film: Reality Tells the Fiction

Authors

  • Rob van Gerwen Utrecht University (Editor-in-Chief)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v3i2.11944

Keywords:

philosophy of film, reality and fiction, film, Nuri Bilge Ceylan, Robert Bresson

Abstract

Robert Bresson's cinematography allows him to show the affordances that things and situations have for characters in a film. By intimating these affordances, Bresson authentically presents the affordances as well as the characters. The fact that Bresson views and conceives of his `actors' as models, rather than as malleable actors, illustrates, again, an effort to authentically film real persons in real situations. Recognising people authentically is done in real-life through a reciprocal gaze, which is not automatically available to the camera's lens, an apparatus that does not look back at one. Perhaps, Nuri Bilge Ceylan's approach fits this effort better: not a writing with sounds and images, but an intuitive use of homeliness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristotle. n.d. (1965). On the Art of Poetry. Classical Literary Criticism. Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books.

Azoulay, Ariella. 2008. The Civil Contract of Photography. New York: Zone Books.

Barthes, Roland. 2000 (1980). Camera Lucida. Translated by Richard Howard. London: Vintage.

Bresson, Robert. 2016. Notes on the Cinematograph. New York: The New York Review of Books, Inc.

Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film. Enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Currie, Gregory. 1998a. “The Film Theory that Never Was: A Nervous Manifesto.” In Film Theory and Philosophy, edited by Richard Allen and Murray Smith, 42–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- 1998b. Image and Mind. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fridlund, Alan J. 1997. “The new ethology of human facial expressions.” In The Psychology of Facial Expression, edited by James A. Russell and José-Miguel Fernandez-Dols, 103–32. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Frijda, Nico, and Anna Tcherkassof. 1997. “Facial Expressions as Modes of Action Readiness.” In The Psychology of Facial Expression, edited by James A. Russell and José-Miguel Fernandez-Dols, 78–102. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gerwen, Rob van. 2002. “An ontological fallacy in Analytical Aesthetics (In Dutch: De ontologische drogreden in de analytische esthetica).” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 94:109–123.

- 2013. “Waiting for Imagery. The Tragic Retoric of Iconic pho- tographs (In Dutch: Wachten op beeld. De tragische retorica van iconische foto’s).” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 105 (1): 40–54.

- 2018. Shall we stay in touch. How we remove the mind from our world view. (In Dutch, Zullen we contact houden. Hoe we de geest uit ons wereldbeeld verwijderen.). Utrecht: Klement.

Gibson, J.J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. London, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View From Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2003 (1956). Being and Nothingness. An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes. New York and London: Routledge.

Scruton, Roger. 1983. “Photography and Representation.” In The Aesthetic Understanding: Essays in the Philosophy of Art and Culture, 102–126. London, New York: Methuen.

Walton, Kendall L. 1984. “Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism.” Critical Inquiry 11:246–77.

- 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, Massachussetts: Harvard University Press.

- 1998. “On Pictures and Photographs: Objections Answered.” In Film Theory and Philosophy, edited by Richard Allen and Murray Smith, 60–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Fontana Press.

Wollheim, Richard. 1984. The Thread of Life. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

- 1988. “The Spectator in the Picture.” In Painting as an Art, 101– 186. Princeton / London: Princeton University Press / Thames and Hudson.

- 1993. “Pictorial Style: Two Views.” In The Mind and its Depths, 171–184. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-22

Issue

Section

Philosophy of film without theory

How to Cite

van Gerwen, Rob. 2020. “What They See Is What We Get in Film: Reality Tells the Fiction”. Aesthetic Investigations 3 (2): 365-86. https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v3i2.11944.