The paradox of fact from fiction; What fiction can and can’t tell us about the real world

Authors

  • Todd Jones University of Nevada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4067679

Keywords:

justification, knowledge, Fiction

Abstract

In philosophical discussions of literature, there is a great deal of discussion about what’s been termed “the paradox of fiction”: how is it that we can be emotionally moved by characters that we know are not real?  But an important related problem might be called the paradox of fact from fiction: how can an invented fictional world give us knowledge about the real one?     In this essay I will look carefully at how fictional worlds could possibly tell us about real ones, and whether they, in fact, tends to do so.   I then discuss ideas about how we might change how fiction is taught, in light of these conclusions.

Author Biography

Todd Jones, University of Nevada

Las Vegas Professor of Philosophy

References

Cited References

Buckwalter, W. and S. Stich. 2011. The Philosophers' Magazine 52:60-65.

Carroll, N. 2002. “The Wheel of Virtue: Art, Literature, and Moral Knowledge.” The

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1):3-26.

Conee, E. and Feldman, R. 2001. “Internalism Defended.” American Philosophical

Quarterly 38(1): 1–18.

Currie, G. 2013. “Does Great Literature Make Us Better?” New York Times. June 1.

Davis, T. 2008. Humanism (The New Critical Idiom). New York: Routledge

Durnal, E. 2010. “Crime Scene Investigation (as seen on TV).” Forensic Science

International 199(1-3):1-5.

Friend, S. (2006) “Narrating the Truth (More or Less),” in M. Kieran and D. Lopes (eds.)

Knowing Art: Essays in Aesthetics and Epistemology, Dordrecht: Springer. 35-49.

Friend, S. 2014. “Believing in Stories.” In G. Currie, M. Kieran, A. Meskin

and J. Robson (eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind. Oxford University Press

-248.

Gendler, T. 2009. “Alief and Belief.” Journal of Philosophy 105 (10): 634-663.

Keen, S. 2007. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kitcher, P. 2011. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. Knobe, J., and R. Samuels. 2013. “Thinking Like a Scientist: Innateness as a Case

Study.” Cognition, 126(1): 72-86.

Matravers, D. 2015 Fiction and Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Novitz, D. 1987 Knowledge, Fiction and Imagination. Philadelphia, PA: Temple

Univeristy Press.

O’Neil, O. 1986. The Power of example. Philosophy 61 (235): 5– 29.

Posner, R. 1997. “Against Ethical Criticism.” Philosophy and Literature 21

(1): 1-27.

Roiphe, K. 2013 The Reluctant American in

http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/roiphe/2013/04/what_the_reluctant_fundamentalist_can_teach_us_about_the_boston_bombers.html

Schnall, Simone, J. Haidt, G. Clore, and A. Jordan. 2008. “Disgust as Embodied Moral

Judgment.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1069- 1109.

Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2008. “Framing Moral Intuitions.” In W. Sinnott- Armstrong

(Ed.) Moral Psychology, vol. 2, The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and

Diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Thompson, J. 1976 Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem, 59 The Monist 204-17

Tognetti, A. Assortative mating based on cooperativeness and generosity. Journal of

Evolutionary Biology. 27(5):975-81.

Vaesen, K, M. Peterson, and B. Van Bezooijen. 2013. “The Reliability of Armchair

Intuitions.” Metaphilosophy, 44(5): 559-578.

Weinberg, J., J. Alexander, C. Gonnerman, and S Reuter. 2012. "Restrictionism and

Reflection." The Monist, 95: 200-222.

Walton, K. 1990. Mimesis As Make-believe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-24

Issue

Section

Is there truth through literature?