Restoring Culture to Manage the Subjective

Authors

  • Rob van Gerwen University Utrecht

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v2i2.11962

Keywords:

restoration, aesthetic value, subjective, authenticity

Abstract

When we want a cultural object restored, the major reason for this is the value that we attribute to the thing. Paradoxically, restoration is an objective process, but its aim is the preservation of the thing's subjective appreciation. What does this paradox consist in?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ankersmit, Frank. 1993. De historische ervaring. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij.

Koolhaas, Rem, and Bruce Mau. 1998. S, M, L, XL. Monacelli Press.

Tollebeek, Jo, and Tom Verschaffel. 1992. De vreugden van Houssaye. Apologie van de historische interesse. Amsterdam: Wereldbibliotheek.

Wollheim, Richard. 1984. The Thread of Life. Cambridge, New York:

Cambridge University Press.

— 1993. “Pictorial Style: Two Views.” In The Mind and its Depths, 171–184. Cambridge (Mass.), London (England): Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-16

Issue

Section

From the Editor

How to Cite

van Gerwen, Rob. 2019. “Restoring Culture to Manage the Subjective”. Aesthetic Investigations 2 (2): i-vii. https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v2i2.11962.