Kill-Or-Cure Remedy Challenge: Approaches to Authenticity in the Interpretation and Preservation of Paintings by Edvard Munch at the Munch Museum

Jin Strand Ferrer; Terje Syversen; Tomas Markevicius

doi:10.58519/aesthinv.v2i2.11964

Authors

Jin Strand Ferrer Munch Museum
Terje Syversen Kulturetaten, Oslo
Tomas Markevicius Cologne Institute for Conservation Science, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v2i2.11964

Keywords:

Conservation, Authenticity, Kill-or-cure remedy, Edvard Munch

Abstract

Despite the controversies surrounding the artistic concept known to Edvard Munch conservators as the `kill-or-cure' remedy (leaving paintings outdoors to become weathered), this paper argues that this practice is an integral part of his artistic identity and must therefore be considered in conservation strategies and treatment choices. Starting with a brief overview of Munch's experimental painting techniques and use of materials, this paper introduces several challenges confronting conservators tasked with conserving Munch's works. To date, conservators' treatment of Munch's `kill-or-cure' remedy as an artistic concept has dominated and shaped the way conservators mediate and preserve his art. This paper shows how changes in conservation philosophies, as well as aesthetic and art historical theories, influence conservation treatments; ultimately affects the public's perception and appreciation of Munch's art. This paper argues that surface irregularities caused by Munch's `kill-or-cure' remedy are not only a central theme in Munch's work, but are especially relevant as marks of authenticity.

References

Aslaksby, Trond. 2015. “Edvard Munch’s painting The Scream (1893).” In Public paintings by Edvard Munch and his contemporaries, change and

conservation challenges, edited by T. et al. Frøysaker, 52–71. London:

Archetype Publications.

Buchhart, Dieter. 2014. “The Nature of Disappearance.” In Marianne

Boesky Gallery, Minneapolis, 30. New York: The Avery Group at Shapco

Printing.

Callen, Anthea. 1982. The techniques of the Impressionists. U.S.: Chartwell

Books Inc.

Carlyle, Leslie. 2002. The Artist’s Assistant Oil painting instruction

manuals and handbooks in Britain 1800-1900 With reference to selected

Eighteenth-century sources. London: Archetype Publications.

Clavir, Miriam. 1998. “The social and historic construction of professional

values in conservation.” Studies in Conservation 43:1–8: 69.

Dahl, Chrix. 1946. “Mesteren på Ekely.” Kunst og Kultur, Gyldendal, Oslo

:224.

Dørje-Haug, Ole. 1949. Unpublished letter to the first Director of Munch’s

art collection. Oslo kommunes kunstsamlinger, inv.no. 70/49.

Ferrer, Jin.S., Alyssa Hull, and Terje Syversen. 2016. “Investigating surface

phenomena in paints and paintings by Edvard Munch (1863-1944)—in

the context of the artist’s painting materials.” In Colour Change in Paintings, edited by Alexandra Gent Rhiannon Clarricoates, Helen Dowding. London: Archetype Publications Ltd.

Grimstad, Inger. 2000. “Menneskeberget: En studie av Edvard Munch.”

Ph.D. diss., Oslo.

Hackney, Stephen. 2004. Paintings on Canvas: Lining and Alternatives.

http://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/

/paintings-on-canvas-lining-and-alternatives. (Accessed: 24

November 2017).

Jong, Fredrik. 2015. “Edvard Munch’s Separation: past and present treatment strategies.” In Public paintings by Edvard Munch and his contemporaries: Change and conservation challenges, edited by T. et al. Frøysaker,

–114. London: Archetype Publications.

Langaard, Johann H. 1951. “Beretning om virksomheten i fem-årsperioden

-1951.” In Oslo Kommunes Kunstsamlinger årbok 1946-1951, 75–76.

Oslo: Munchmuseet.

Mass, Jennifer. et al. 2015. “Cadmium yellow degradation mechanisms in

Henri Matisse’s Le Bonheur de vivre (1905-06) compared to the Munch

Museum’s The Scream (c.1910): fluorescence imaging and chemical speciation

as function of depth. Part 2: Fluorescence imaging.” In Public Paintings by Edvard Munch and his contemporaries: Change and conservation challenges, edited by Tine Frøysaker et al., 308–324. London: Archetype Publications Ltd.

Milnes, Anne, and Biljana Topalova-Casadiego. 2008. “Konserveringen av

Munch-museets Madonna: Undersøkelser og betraktninger. Madonna.”

Munch-museet/Vigmostad and Bjørke, Oslo.

Munch, Edvard. 2008. MM N 38. Aphorisms related to art. https:

//www.emunch.no/TRANS_HYBRIDMM_N0038.xhtml. (Accessed 13 December,

.

Muñoz Viñas, Salvador. 2005. Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Great

Britain: Elsevier.

Phillipot, Paul. 1996. “Historic Preservation: Philosophy, criteria, guidelines,

I.” In Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage, edited by A. Kirby Talley N. Price and M. J. Vaccaro. Canada: Paul Getty Trust.

Riegl, Alois. 1996. “The Modern Cult of Monuments.” In Historical and

Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage, edited by

A. Kirby Talley N. Price and M. J. Vaccaro, 69–83. Canada: Paul Getty

Trust.

Stein, Mille. 2014. Edvard Munch and the “Kill-or-Cure” Remedy. Analysis

of the Ekely Collection at the Munch Museum. Volume 28 (2). Zeitschrift

für Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung.

Stenersen, Rudolf. 1946. Edvard Munch. Nærbilde av et geni. Oslo: Gyldendal.

Thurmann-Moe, Jan. 1995. “Edvard Munch’s “kill-or-cure” Treatment Experiments

with Technique and Materials.” Munchmuseet, Oslo.

Woll, Gerd. 2008. Edvard Munch: samlede malerier (4 vols). Oslo: Cappelen

Damm.