Beyond Autonomy and Activism:

‘Poetic Understanding’ as a Ground for Political Community

Authors

  • Divya Nadkarni University of Amsterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v5i2.12083

Keywords:

Poetic Understanding, Political community, Poetry, Plurality, Intersubjectivity

Abstract

This paper takes the particular case of poetry to chart a middle route between the extremes of the autonomist and activist dimensions of understanding aesthetic politics. I argue that the politicality of poetry lies neither in the politics of the author or the text (activist), nor in their removedness vis-à-vis concrete political situations (autonomist). Instead, politicality needs to be located in the intersubjective dynamic between readers and poems or works of art more broadly. I propose an intersubjective pragmatist framework of interpretation, which takes the actualization of a decolonial and anti-identitarian political plurality as the basis of poetry’s politicality. I develop the framework by bringing together three conceptual frameworks: Hannah Arendt’s theory of political plurality, Édouard Glissant’s concepts of relation and opacity, and John Dewey’s pragmatist theory of aesthetic experience. At its core is the concept of ‘poetic understanding’, a transformative quality of understanding that facilitates between the reader and the text a dynamic and contingent process of mutual transformation and constitution. I explore the potential of such understanding as a ground for political community.

References

Adorno, Theodor. Aesthetic Theory. Edited by Gretel Adorno and Rolf Tiedemann. Translated by Robert Hullot-Kentor. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.

Altieri, Charles M. “Why Modernist Claims for Autonomy Matter.” Journal of Modern Literature 32, no. 3 (2009): 1–21.

Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Second Edi. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.

Awkward, Michael. “Negotiations of Power: White Critics, Black Texts, and the Self-Referential Impulse.” American Literary History 2, no. 4 (1990): 581–606.

Baraka, Amiri. SOS: Poems 1961–2013. Edited by Paul Vangelisti. New York: Grove Press, 2015.

Bernstein, Charles, ed. The Politics of Poetic Form: Poetry and Public Policy. Berkeley: Roof Books, 1990.

Britton, Celia. Edouard Glissant and Postcolonial Theory: Strategies of Language and Resistance. New World Studies. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1999.

Butler, Judith. Notes Towards a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.

Cavell, Stanley. Must We Mean What We Say?: A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Coombes, Sam. Edouard Glissant: A Poetics of Resistance. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.

Dean, Jodi. Solidarity of Strangers: Feminism after Identity Politics. Berkeley: Univ of California Press, 1996.

Dewey, John. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee, Penguin, 2005.

Diawara, Manthia. “Édouard Glissant’s Worldmentality: An Introduction to One World in Relation.” South Magazine, Documenta 14, no. 6 (2015). https://www.documenta14.de/en/south/34_edouard_glissant_s_worldmentality_an_introduction_to_one_world_in_relation.

Drabinski, John E., and Maria Parham, eds. Theorizing Glissant: Sites and Citations. Creolizing the Canon. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2015.

Fish, Stanley. “Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics.” New Literary History 2, no. 1 (1970): 123–62.

Fitterman, Robert. “Does American Political Poetry Have a Future?” Vice, 2014. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9bznvp/does-american-political-poetry-have-a-future-707.

Glissant, Edouard. Poetics of Relation. Translated by Betsy Wing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.

Haider, Asad. Mistaken Identity: Race and Class in the Age of Trump. London: Verso Books, 2018.

Hirsch, Edward. A Poet’s Glossary. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014.

Hong, Cathy Park. “Delusions of Whiteness in the Avant-Garde.” Lana Turner 7, no. 7 (2014): n.p. http://www.lanaturnerjournal.com/print-issue-7-contents/delusions-of-whiteness-in-the-avant-garde.

Iser, Wolfgang. Prospecting: From Reader Response to Literary Anthropology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.

Kaufmann, David. Reading Uncreative Writing: Conceptualism, Expression, and the Lyric. Modern and Contemporary Poetry and Poetics Series. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

Kautzer, Chad. “Political Violence and Race: A Critique of Hannah Arendt.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 21, no. 3 (2019): 2–12.

Kivy, Peter. The Performance of Reading: An Essay in the Philosophy of Literature. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.

Lamarque, Peter. “Philosophy and the Lyric.” Journal of Literary Theory 11, no. 1 (2017): 63–73.

Loidolt, Sophie. Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity. New York: Routledge, 2018.

Marchart, Oliver. Conflictual Aesthetics: Artistic Activism and the Public Sphere. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2019.

Marchart, Oliver. “Democracy and Minimal Politics: The Political Difference and Its Consequences.” South Atlantic Quarterly 110, no. 4 (2011): 965–73.

Marchart, Oliver. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.

Mufti, Aamir R. “Orientalism and the Institution of World Literatures.” Critical Inquiry 36, no. 3 (2010): 458–93.

Murray, Georgia. “Travis Alabanza: What Navigating Public Space Is Like As A Trans Person.” Refinery29, 2017. https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2017/08/166568/travis-alabanza-before-i-step-outside.

Nadkarni, Divya. “Poetic Understanding and Political Community: Actualizing Plurality through Poetry.” University of Amsterdam, 2022.

Nadkarni, Divya. “I Understand You, Across the Chasm That Divides Us: Rethinking Community through Poetry.” Jaarboek Voor Vrouwengeshiedenis 40 (2021): 137–42.

Owens, Patricia. “Racism in the Theory Canon: Hannah Arendt and ‘the One Great Crime in Which America Was Never Involved.’” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 45, no. 3 (2017): 403–24.

Perloff, Marjorie. Differentials: Poetry, Poetics, Pedagogy. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 2004.

Perloff, Marjorie, and Craig Dworkin, eds. The Sound of Poetry, the Poetry of Sound. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.

Reed, Anthony. Freedom Time: The Poetics and Politics of Black Experimental Writing. The Callaloo African Diaspora Series. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2014.

Roelofs, Monique. Arts of Address: Being Alive to Language and the World. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.

Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Rosenblatt, Louise M. “Towards a Transactional Theory of Reading.” Journal of Reading Behavior 1, no. 1 (1969): 31–49.

Shepherd, Reginald. “The Other’s Other: Against Identity Poetry.” Michigan Quarterly Review XLII, no. 4 (September 1, 2003). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.act2080.0042.407.

Stanley, Eric A. “Anti-Trans Optics: Recognition, Opacity, and the Image of Force.” South Atlantic Quarterly 116, no. 3 (2017): 612–20.

Tobias, Saul. “Hegel and the Politics of Recognition.” Owl of Minerva 38, no. 1 (2006): 101–26.

Rooden, Aukje van. Literature, Autonomy and Commitment. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.

Vasterling, Veronica. “Postmodern Hermeneutics? Towards a Critical Hermeneutics.” In Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer, edited by Lorraine Code, 149–80. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003.

Verheyen, Leen. “The Aesthetic Experience of the Literary Artwork. A Matter of Form and Content?” Aesthetic Investigations 1, no. 1 (2015): 23–32.

Wang, Dorothy J. Thinking Its Presence: Form, Race, and Subjectivity in Contemporary Asian American Poetry. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

How to Cite

Nadkarni, Divya. 2023. “Beyond Autonomy and Activism:: ‘Poetic Understanding’ As a Ground for Political Community”. Aesthetic Investigations 5 (2). Utrecht, NL:194-213. https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v5i2.12083.