Dissolved Politics and Artistic Imagination. On Kristeva's Revolution and Revolt

Authors

  • Lenka Vojtíšková Faculty of Humanities, Charles University in Prague

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v5i2.12845

Keywords:

psychoanalysis, literature, politics, Julia Kristeva, revolt, revolution

Abstract

In her work, Julia Kristeva uses two disparate concepts: revolution and revolt. In this article we will try to outline these concepts as different approaches to the relations between power, art and psychoanalysis. By placing the concepts of revolt and revolution in dialogue with each other, and by pointing out that the dialogue departs from the notion of experience, we will attempt to reconstruct the important contribution that Kristeva's work offers. Her perspective reveals that artistic expression is linked to a specific kind of politics (dissolved politics). Kristeva's view of literary and psychoanalytic practice is then, we argue, something that can contribute to its realisation, albeit in a limited way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialog Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Beardsworth, Sara. 2005. “From Revolution to Revolt Culture”. In: Tina Chanter and Ewa Płonowska Ziarek (ed.). Revolt, Affect, Collectivity: The Unstable Boundaries of Kristeva's Polis. New York: SUNY Press.

Boncardo, Robert. 2018. Mallarmé and the Politics of Literature: Sartre, Kristeva, Badiou, Rancière. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Bové, Carol M. 1984. “Review: The Politics of Desire in Julia Kristeva”. Boundary 2, 12(2): 217-228.

Brandt, Joan. 2001. “Revolt or Consensus?: Julia Kristeva in the 1990s”. L'Esprit Créateur, 41(1):85-96.

Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “The Uses and Abuses of French Discourse Theories for Feminist Politics”. In: Nancy Fraser and Sandra Lee Bartky (ed.) Revaluing French Feminism: Critical Essays on Difference, Agency and Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Freud, Sigmund. 2004. Totem and Taboo. London: Routledge.

Kristeva, Julia. 1969. Sèméiotikè. Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Kristeva, Julia. 1977. Polylogue. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Desire in Language. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kristeva, Julia. 1984. Revolution in Poetic Language. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kristeva, Julia. 1986. “Women's Time”. In: Toril Moi (ed.). The Kristeva Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kristeva, Julia. 1987. Tales of Love. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kristeva, Julia. 2000. The Sense and Non-Sense of Revolt: The Powers and Limits of Psychoanalysis. (Vol. 2) New York: Columbia University Press.

Kristeva, Julia. 2002a. Intimate Revolt: The Powers and Limits of Psychoanalysis. (Vol. 2) New York: Columbia University Press.

Kristeva, Julia. 2002b. Revolt, She Said. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Lewis, Philip E. 1974. “Review: Revolutionary Semiotics. Diacritics”, 4(3):28-32.

McAfee, Noëlle. 2014. “Inner Experience and Worldly Revolt: Arendt’s Bearings on Kristeva’s Project”. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy - Revue de la philosophie française et de langue française, 21(2):26-35.

Oliver, Kelly. 2005. “Revolt and Forgiveness”. In: Tina Chanter and Ewa Płonowska Ziarek (ed.) Revolt, Affect, Collectivity: The Unstable Boundaries of Kristeva's Polis. New York: SUNY Press.

Sjöholm, Cecilia. 2005. Kristeva and the Political. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

How to Cite

Vojtíšková, Lenka. 2023. “Dissolved Politics and Artistic Imagination. On Kristeva’s Revolution and Revolt”. Aesthetic Investigations 5 (2): 145-58. https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v5i2.12845.