Another Outcry for Artistic Relevance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v5i2.13645

Keywords:

art, artist, death of the artist, conceptual art

Abstract

Editor's column

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barthes, Roland. 1977. “The death of the author.” In Image, music, text, edited by Stephen Heath, 142–148. London: Fontana.

Dickie, George. 1984. The Art Circle: A Theory of Art. New York: Haven.

Gaut, Berys. 2000. “‘Art’ as a Cluster Concept.” In Theories of Art Today, edited by Noël Carroll, 25–44. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Gerwen, Rob van. 2004. “Ethical Autonomism. The Work of Art as a Moral Agent.” Contemporary Aesthetics, vol. 2.

. 2014. “Artists’ Experiments and Our Issues with Them – Toward a Layered Definition of Art Practice.” Edited by Fabian Dorsch and Dan- Eugen Ratiu, Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, Volume 6. 158–180.

. 2018. Shall we stay in touch. How we remove the mind from our world view. [In Dutch]. Utrecht: Klement.

Walton, Kendall L. 2008. “Categories of Art.” In Marvelous Images. On Values and the Arts, 195–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wollheim, Richard. 1980a. “Criticism as Retrieval.” In Art and its Objects. Second edition, 185–204. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

. 1980b. “The institutional theory of art.” In Art and its Objects. Second edition, 157–167. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

. 1993. “Pictorial Style: Two Views.” In The Mind and its Depths, 171–184. Cambridge (Mass.), London (England): Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

How to Cite

“Another Outcry for Artistic Relevance”. 2023. Aesthetic Investigations 5 (2): i-viii. https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v5i2.13645.