Another Outcry for Artistic Relevance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v5i2.13645

Keywords:

art, artist, death of the artist, conceptual art

Abstract

Editor's column

References

Barthes, Roland. 1977. “The death of the author.” In Image, music, text, edited by Stephen Heath, 142–148. London: Fontana.

Dickie, George. 1984. The Art Circle: A Theory of Art. New York: Haven.

Gaut, Berys. 2000. “‘Art’ as a Cluster Concept.” In Theories of Art Today, edited by Noël Carroll, 25–44. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Gerwen, Rob van. 2004. “Ethical Autonomism. The Work of Art as a Moral Agent.” Contemporary Aesthetics, vol. 2.

. 2014. “Artists’ Experiments and Our Issues with Them – Toward a Layered Definition of Art Practice.” Edited by Fabian Dorsch and Dan- Eugen Ratiu, Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, Volume 6. 158–180.

. 2018. Shall we stay in touch. How we remove the mind from our world view. [In Dutch]. Utrecht: Klement.

Walton, Kendall L. 2008. “Categories of Art.” In Marvelous Images. On Values and the Arts, 195–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wollheim, Richard. 1980a. “Criticism as Retrieval.” In Art and its Objects. Second edition, 185–204. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

. 1980b. “The institutional theory of art.” In Art and its Objects. Second edition, 157–167. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

. 1993. “Pictorial Style: Two Views.” In The Mind and its Depths, 171–184. Cambridge (Mass.), London (England): Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

How to Cite

Gerwen, Rob van. 2023. “Another Outcry for Artistic Relevance”. Aesthetic Investigations 5 (2). Utrecht, NL:i-viii. https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v5i2.13645.