Courage Conquers Death – and Even Love

Feminist Epistemology in Dorothy Arzner’s Christopher Strong

Authors

  • Laura Teresa Di Summa William Paterson University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58519/mge98j55

Keywords:

film, film costumes, dorothy arzner, feminist aesthetics

Abstract

In the 1990s, Laurie Shrage critiqued dominant semiotic and psychoanalytic approaches to film, advocating instead for a contextual analysis attentive to audience reception. Drawing on Christopher Strong (Arzner, 1933), Shrage highlighted its capacity to “disturb patriarchal sensibilities,” particularly in its portrayal of women and marriage. This paper revisits Shrage’s thesis to explore how the film addresses issues that remain relevant today, including female agency within and beyond the institution of marriage. I argue that while the film has been recognized for its narrative and dialogue, its engagement with themes such as women’s employment, motherhood, and caregiving remains critically underexplored. Through a close reading that incorporates cinematic elements, such as costume design, I examine how these themes shape the protagonist’s sense of autonomy and complicate traditional narratives of romantic drama. By situating the film within both its historical and contemporary contexts, I aim to demonstrate its enduring relevance and the significance of returning to questions of spectatorship—what we are meant to see and what we might learn to see anew through a critical, feminist lens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brand, Peg (2006). “Feminist Art Epistemologies: Understanding Feminist Art,” in Hypatia 21 (3):166 - 189.

Campbell Warner, P. (2005). ‘The Americanization of Fashion: Sportswear, the Movies, and the 1930s,’ in L. Welters & P. Cunningham (eds.), Twentieth-Century American Fashion (pp. 79-98). Oxford: Berg.

Casella, Donna R. (2009). “What Women Want: The Complex World of Dorothy Arzner and Her Cinematic Women.” Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media 50, no. 1/2: 235–70.

Cook, Pam (1988). “Approaching the Work of Dorothy Arzner,” in Feminism and Film Theory, ed. Constance Penley. New York: Routledge.

Gaines, Jane (1992). “Dorothy Arzner’s Trousers,” in Jump Cut, n. 37: 88-98.

Houston, Beverle (1984). "Missing in Action: Notes on Dorothy Arzner," Wide Angle 6, no. 3 (1984), 27.

Johnston, Claire, ed. (1975). The Work of Dorothy Arzner: Towards a Feminist Cinema, London: British Film Institute.

Kay, Karen and Peary, Gerald (1977). “Interview with Dorothy Arzner," in Women and the Cinema, Karen Kay and Gerald Peary (eds.), New York: E.P. Dutton.

Kamin, Debra (2023). “Mommunes: Mothers are Living Single Together,” in The New York Times. Accessed online on September 14th 2023: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/12/realestate/single-mother-households-co-living.html

Kolomatsky, Michael (2023). “Single Women Own More Homes Than Single Men,” in The New York Times. Accessed online on September 14th 2023: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/02/realestate/single-women-own-more-homes-than-single-men.html

Mayne, Judith (1994). Directed by Dorothy Arzner. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Palladino, Grace (1996). Teenagers: An American History. New York: Basic Books

Shrage, Laurie (1990) “Feminist Film Aesthetics: A Contextual Approach.” Hypatia 5, no. 2: 137–48.

Welters, L. & Cunningham, P. A. (2005). Twentieth-century American Fashion. Berg: Oxford.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Di Summa, Laura Teresa. 2026. “Courage Conquers Death – and Even Love: Feminist Epistemology in Dorothy Arzner’s Christopher Strong”. Aesthetic Investigations 8 (1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.58519/mge98j55.